When I tell people that boys between 5 and 9 are at the highest risk for dog bites, I'm often asked why. As the mother of three sons, I have to suppress the desire to be flippant and answer, "Because they act like boys."
I believe that there are three primary reasons 5-to-9-year-old boys are bitten more than any other category of people:
- Because they act like boys. (Okay, it's flippant, but there is some truth to this. Boys tend to be louder, faster, and more rambunctious than adults or girls.)
- Because the boys (and adults) don't know how to recognize the difference between tolerance and enjoyment--and so they push the limits without even knowing they are doing so.
- Because they aren't as carefully supervised as younger children. Most parents will let kids this age go in/out and up/down without following their every move.
But this blog post is particularly interesting because two boys were bitten by each other's dog within half an hour!
Incident #1 - Two boys are playing in Boy #2's yard with Boy #2's dog. "The dog owner calls, apologizes profusely, explains...she doesn't know
what happened, she didn't see anything. Her son and Rhyse were playing
outside, then Rhyse was gone. I accept her apology, I do not think her
dog attacked my son, I think it seemed more of an excited bite than an
aggressive one. We talk, we're fine."
Notes: No adult supervision, minor injury (on the boy's side), Boy #1 was familiar with the dog (but didn't live with the dog), no medical attention needed.
Incident #2 (30 minutes later) - Boy #2 bitten by Boy #1's dog. So the boys are now playing at Boy #1's house. "In the case with our dog, they were trying to catch her (she had gotten
out). So they were cornering her, Chas, Rhyse and this other child,
trying to get ahold of her, to bring her back inside. She's ok with my
boys doing this, she knows them. But I think she got scared when the
other boy closed in on her, they were all yelling and I think she felt
threatened."
Notes: No adult supervision, minor injury (on boy's lip), Boy #2 was familiar with the dog (but, just as before, the dog bit the friend, not the child she knew best and was most comfortable with), no medical attention needed.
The most telling line in the blog is this: "We knew our guys were playing too aggressively."
Sometimes there's a "boys will be boys" philosophy at play when parents don't intervene in kid-and-dog interactions.
One of my pet peeves (not included in this blog post) is parents who tell me, "My dog is great. She'll let my kids do anything to her. They can pull on her ears or tail, and she just lets them." That makes me crazy-crazy-crazy! WHY? Why do you allow that to happen?
I say over and over that good dogs and good kids will have miscommunications every day (perhaps I should now say every 30 minutes). We really need to teach adults and children how to interact with dogs in the best ways and how to know what a situation is deteriorating.
The good news in this case (and in the vast majority of dog bite incidents) is that the bites didn't cause any serious injuries.
But better news would be that these families had learned something valuable from these bites. I didn't get that vibe from this post. Instead I got the feeling that both moms were agreeing that "these things happen" and "dog bites are unpredictable/unavoidable." Not true. Both of these bites could have been prevented.
COMMON RISK FACTORS SCORECARD: 4 (to 5) of 7
YES - Bite victim between 5 and 9 years old (the age group at highest risk)
YES -
Bite victim was familiar with the biting dog
YES - Bite victim was male (boys are bitten nearly twice as often as girls)
YES (2nd boy), NO (1st boy) - Facial wound
NO - Multiple bites
UNCLEAR - Dog kept chained or penned outside
NO (while two dogs bit, these were two separate incidents) -
Multiple dogs involved